Michael Brecker
Interview - From the E-MU Website
Source: http://ewi-evi.com/mb_emu.htm
E-MU: Can you give us an update on your
career? What have you been working on?
MB: Well, I just finished a brand-new CD. It's called "Nearness of
You/The Ballad Book." It's a CD comprised completely of ballads. I had a
great time recording it. Herbie Hancock plays piano, Pat Metheny plays
guitar, Jack DeJohnette plays drums, Charlie Haden plays bass, and James
Taylor sings on a couple of songs. We had a ball making the record. It
should come out in June. It's on the Verve label.
E-MU: Is that a solo album?
MB: It's a solo album.
E-MU: I guess you've been touring, too? You just got back?
MB: I'm touring quite a bit. I just returned from a tour of South
America and Mexico with my band.
E-MU: How'd you break into gigging with big names like Horace Silver?
MB: Well, I grew up playing jazz and R&B in Philadelphia. When I
first moved to New York, my brother Randy was already playing trumpet with
Horace. My brother and I first formed a group called Dreams. We were
recording for Columbia Records when I was 19. When that band broke up, I
decided to audition for Horace since he had an opening, a saxophone chair,
so I auditioned and I got the gig. For me, it was very important because it
was my first real jazz gig. He was a great band leader and teacher. I stayed
with him for about a year-and-a-half and we did a lot of touring. I learned
a lot from Horace, a lot of important tips about presentation and music.
E-MU: Can you share a couple of those tips?
MB: Well, they have to do with musical sensibility in regards to
soloing, improvising, and creating tension and release in soloing, and at
the same time doing it in a predetermined kind of space. He instructed me on
how to play shorter solos and be able to get the same message across. And
that was, for me, very helpful. Aside from other things concerning rhythm
and swinging and things that are a little difficult to explain in
non-musical terms.
E-MU: Did you play funk before playing with Horace?
MB: Having grown up in Philadelphia, which was kind of a rock and
roll, R&B town, I was exposed to blues and R&B, as well as to jazz. My
father was a jazz musician, a jazz pianist -- semi-professional, he was also
an attorney. In reverse order, really, he was an attorney first, but he had
a real passion for jazz and he played great piano, so he took my brother and
I to many, many concerts in the Philadelphia area. So by the time I was 12
years old, I had already heard Miles Davis' band, Dave Brubeck, Duke
Ellington, Count Basie, Woody Herman, Cannonball Adderley, Jimmy Smith,
Thelonious Monk -- on and on, that's what we did. It was, for me, a lot of
fun, a great way to grow up.
E-MU: You're the most recorded saxophonist since 1975?
MB: Well, where'd that come from? You must've gone on the internet.
E-MU: You have a lot of fans spreading rumors?
MB: I don't know. I did a lot of recording in the '70s through the
mid-'80's. I also did quite a bit of studio work.
E-MU: What do you like more, live performance or studio work?
MB: I like both, depending. You can't really compare because it really
depends. When you're playing live, it depends on so many things -- same
thing in the studio. It depends on the project, what's going on in the
studio. But both are tremendously fulfilling. I would probably have to say
that all in all, I prefer to play live.
E-MU: Where do you see your music style going?
MB: I'm going to go ahead like two blocks, and then make a left. And
then try to stay in the middle lane, but occasionally kind of speed up and
go in the left lane. No, really, I like to keep it fresh. I'm always
intrigued by doing things that are new for me. Not necessarily new to music,
but things that I haven't done. It keeps it challenging for me, so each
project that I take on is usually something that I haven't done before. For
instance, make a ballad record. On the record before, I recorded an album
with organ with a gentleman named Larry Goldings, who's one of my favorite
musicians and someone with whom I'd been wanting to record. The next album
is probably going to lean towards the African...kind of an African slant.
E-MU: You mean the rhythms or the instrumentation?
MB: The rhythms and the harmony. But kind of juxtaposed with the way
I like to improvise. It's hard to explain. But I can hear it in my head. I
wish I could plug you into my head.
E-MU: You're such a versatile musician. You've played with people
from Chet Baker to Jaco and Zappa. How do you approach such a wide variety
of styles?
MB: Well, it's not as difficult as you would expect. I grew up
listening to a lot of different kinds of music and played, as you said, in
many different genres. Being a horn player, it's not that difficult (for me
at least it hasn't been) to switch gears because a lot of the same musical
fundamentals hold true or remain true in any context that I'm playing in.
And it's just being kind of familiar with and liking the style that I'm
playing in. But they're all connected as well. Jazz is not that different
from R&B -- they're all connected in a lot of ways, at least in Western
music. So it's not that much of a stretch.
E-MU: You're a major influence on younger tenor players. What do you
think of your role in transforming jazz?
MB: Well, I would say that I don't really think about that. I've never
really been concerned with that. When I'm approached by young players for
tips or for lessons or for pointers, I tell them to listen to the people
that I listened to because that's really where my playing came from --
musicians such as John Coltrane, Sonny Rollins, Charlie Parker, Miles Davis,
Joe Henderson, and on and on, the list is huge. But those guys are the guys
I listened to and continue to listen to. Most of my vocabulary has come from
them.
E-MU: I see a resurgence of funk as a jazz style with newcomers like
Charlie Hunter and Medeski Martin & Wood. Do you have any comments on that?
MB: I've always been interested in funk from any angle. I've played
in many different funk-related formats, for lack of a better word. The music
is constantly cycling and the whole thing is cyclical. We can keep
revisiting all of these things in fresh ways because there's a lot of room
for growth.
E-MU: Do you think it brings more listeners to jazz?
MB: I hope so.
E-MU: On a totally different subject, what do you think about MP3
sharing technology? Do you care if your music's up on Napster?
MB: I'm split right down the middle because I do care if it appears,
which it does. On the other hand, I love getting stuff for free (laughs).
The musicians and the artists have to be protected, and they're working it
out now in a way that everyone can benefit. We work very hard, spend years
on our music and our art, so we do want to be protected from being
completely ripped off. But it is a dilemma because obviously the internet
technology is not going to go away. And there are many positive things from
places like Napster. It's a great way for people to hear music that previous
to that had no access to it. It's fantastic to have access to such a huge
library of stuff. So there are a lot of good things. Hopefully, there'll be
some kind of resolution where everyone can be okay with it. We'll see what
happens.
I can't download MP3s because it takes too
long. I unfortunately can only get 56k where I live -- no cable or DSL. I've
downloaded maybe two MP3s -- I have no patience. We're really still in the
early stages of the internet. We're going to be seeing phenomenal speed
increases in the not so distant future.
E-MU: How do you plan to use your E4?
MB: I'm planning to use it with an instrument that I play called an
EWI, which is an Electronic Wind Instrument, kind of a wind-driven
synthesizer. I've been playing it for many years and have recently taken
kind of a break from it for awhile because I got tired of lugging equipment.
I was hoping to shrink the racks down to a PowerBook and the E4.
E-MU: What kind of music are you going to do with that? What kind of
sound? Fusion?
MB: No, not fusion. That's kind of a misleading term. But it would be
probably acoustically oriented, improvised, open music -- on the acoustic
side, but with the EWI as well. That's a really terrible explanation. But
I'm not interested in playing loud music right now. I've been more
interested in improvising and having musical conversations with my fellow
musicians on stage in an intimate way. That really excites me. The EWI is a
very effective tool; it's a very expressive solo instrument. It's capable of
providing a lot of different colors and shapes. It pretty much can do
anything and I'm just looking for a way to shrink it down. So that's why I'm
playing the E4.